SOP 14: Children: "Mine" or "Ours"
In my last blog, entitled "Why I'm a Republican," I listed twenty-seven reasons why I chose to join the GOP. They boil down to the simple fact that the Republican Party, especially at the state level, is better at restricting the growth and scope of government, and thus at protecting individual rights.
I immediately drew responses from Democrats, both in writing and verbal, claiming that I was somehow mistaken, that these were Democratic principles I was endorsing. Jim Splaine, a man I admire for his stances on certain topics, went so far as to say that I should return to the Democratic Party, since that’s obviously where I belong.
These claims, that my Republican principles were somehow also Democratic ones, had me feeling as if I had entered the Twilight Zone. And so, I immediately went off to do some research to alleviate this out-of-sorts feeling. I didn’t have to look long.
Statement of Principle (SOP) 14 states: “I am a Republican because I believe that parents have every right to raise their children as they see fit. Democrats do not believe they are “your” children, they believe they are “our” children.”
Both Democrats and Republicans believe that providing for the education of their children is of monumental importance. Regardless of party, everyone wishes for their children to get the undeniable advantages that come from a quality, well-rounded education. Also, most parents believe – and most teachers would agree – that education does not begin and end at the schoolhouse door. Good parents take an active interest in their children’s education, by ensuring that their homework is done, by exposing them to all manner of museums, books, nature, and by staying in touch with their children’s teachers.
In fact, some parents are so good at this, and they take such an interest in their children’s education, that they choose to educate their children themselves. They have the time, they have the energy, and they have the ability to take full responsibility for their children’s learning. Study after study has shown that homeschooled children obtain educations on a par with or superior to that available at public or private schools. Also, despite the myth to the contrary, study after study has indicated that homeschooled children grow up to be well-socialized, well-rounded adults. Anecdotally, I can state unequivocally that the dozen or so homeschooled children I have met were extremely polite, well-behaved, and most stunningly of all, fascinated with learning.
I believe, as a Republican, that the decision of whether or not to homeschool one’s children should rest entirely with the parents. To listen to several readers of my blog, so do Democrats.
Senate Bill 337, sponsored by Senator Iris Estabrook (D), would require that parents submit a curriculum plan before beginning to homeschool. Also, the bill requires the curriculum covers a multitude of topics, from spelling to the state Constitution.
This bill is an assault on the natural right of parents to decide on the best way to raise their children. It is a clear case of the rights of the individual against the demands of the state. This bill represents the dangerous view that your children aren’t "yours," they are “ours.” And by “ours,” they mean “theirs.” If I’m wrong about party philosophy, and all of those people who insisted that I was really speaking of Democratic principles were right, then the Democratic majority in the senate would have shot this down cold, right?
The bill passed the senate on a vote of 22-14. Voting yea were Senators Burling, Cilley, D’Allesandro, DeVries, Estabrook, Foster, Fuller Clark, Gottesman, Hassan, Janeway, Kelly, Larsen, Reynolds, and Sgambati. Voting nay were Senators Barnes, Bragdon, Clegg, Downing, Gallus, Gatsas, Kenney, Letourneau, Odell, and Roberge.
What’s the trend?
Every single Democrat voted for the bill. Every single Republican voted against it.
I care about parental rights. That’s why I’m a Republican.
Senate Bill 337 is scheduled for a hearing before the House Education Committee at 10 am on April 15th in Representatives Hall, in the State House. Regardless of your party affiliation, if you believe in the principle that parents should be able to raise their children without onerous state oversight, please consider either attending the hearing to speak against the bill or calling the members of the education committee to ask them to oppose it.

Reader Comments (6)
You point out the upside of homeschooling without pointing out the downside.
I had relatives that homeschooled their kids. Don't want to run down my own family, but to put it mildly my relatives had been terrible students themselves and very limited knowledge of history, literature, math and well you get the picture.
They also had a lot of kids.
Anyway it was a disaster. The kids ended up uneducated and some have been jailed over and over.
The question is this? Without any standards at all, these scenarios play out everyday of the week in NH.
If you get beyond the ideological slant and just witness the fate of uneducated children its hard to justify doing nothing.
If a child lives in a town with a failing public school and their parents don't have the money for private school what options do they have? Home school or the failing public school... that's it. We need to do better for our kids. We need to give them a true open market with true choice.
The legislative solution here is going to be education tax credits for parents who purchase educational services outside the government system. We'll see how the 21st Century Republican party chooses to handle this issue, both in DC and in Concord, and it will be a true test of whether or not the GOP actually believes in individual liberty and free markets.
Matt
The real danger of SB337 is the education system having to define a curriculum.
No Child Left Behind pulls money if the state doesn't comply with it's own edcational standards.
The state can't afford to have standards or "adequate education".
Estabrook, girl, you don't want to go there.
My opinion, get the state and fed out of the public schools. Keep them locally funded and ran. That way, the market has a chance to improve them via healthy town to town competition.
We are in dire need of some serious discussions on a number of public policy issues.