McInnes/Buchanan Observations - You Could Do Worse

Political leftists are like dangerous animals, so they must be treated with extreme caution. Hipster-writer Gavin McInnes interviewed some of them at the Trump rally the other day in New York, and this much is clear: The hatred spewed by leftists is exceeded only by their craven stupidity. Don't laugh. A rabid dog is "stupid", but can still mortally wound a human. Read all about it in Fear and Loathing at the Trump Rally.

Patrick Buchanan, on the other hand, writes about the GOP's great conundrum. Its electoral coalition is based on three groups with distinct ideas and philosophy. The question is whether they can unite to defeat the Democrat leftists. Says Buchanan, "While the GOP appears headed for a train wreck in Cleveland, the principal ingredients of a Republican victory and a Republican future will all be present there: Cruz conservatives and Tea Party types, Trumpite nationalists and populists, Rubio-Kasich-Bush centrists and moderates. Political statesmanship could yet bring about unity, and victory, but unfortunately the smart money is on ego getting in the way." (You can read the whole thing HERE if you like.)


CLICK to subscribe to this list by Tim Condon

12 Liberty Lane Grafton, NH 03240 USA
Sent to —  Unsubscribe



Jefferson And The Muslim Pirates

When Thomas Jefferson saw there was no negotiating with Muslims, he formed what is now the Marines (sea going soldiers).  These Marines were attached to U. S. Merchant vessels. When the Muslims attacked U.S. merchant vessels they were repulsed by armed soldiers, but there is more.

The Marines followed the Muslims back to their villages and killed every man, woman, and child in the village. It didn't take long for the Muslims to leave U.S. Merchant vessels alone. This why the Marine Hymn contains the verse, "To the Shores of Tripoli".

English and French merchant vessels started running up our flag when entering the Mediterranean to secure safe travel. This is very interesting and a must-read piece of our history.  It points out where we may be heading.  

Most Americans are unaware of the fact that over two hundred years ago the United States had declared war on Islam, and Thomas Jefferson led the charge!

At the height of the 18th century, Muslim pirates (the "Barbary Pirates") were the terror of the Mediterranean and a large area of the North Atlantic. They attacked every ship in sight, and held the crews for exorbitant ransoms.

Those taken hostage were subjected to barbaric treatment and wrote heart-breaking letters home, begging their governments and families to pay whatever their Mohammedan captors demanded.

These extortionists of the high seas represented the North African Islamic nations of Tripoli, Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers - collectively referred to as the Barbary Coast - and presented a dangerous and unprovoked threat to the new American Republic Before the Revolutionary War, U.S. merchant ships had been under the protection of Great Britain.  When the U.S. declared its independence and entered into war, the ships of the United States were protected by France.

However, once the war was won, America had to protect its own fleets Thus, the birth of the U.S. Navy.  Beginning in 1784, 17 years before he would become president, Thomas Jefferson became America's Minister to France.  That same year, the U.S. Congress sought to appease its Muslim adversaries by following in the footsteps of European nations who paid bribes to the Barbary States rather than engaging them in war.

In July of 1785, Algerian pirates captured American ships, and the Dey of Algiers demanded an unheard-of ransom of $60,000.  It was a plain and simple case of extortion, and Thomas Jefferson was vehemently opposed to any further payments.

Instead, he proposed to Congress the formation of a coalition of allied nations who together could force the Islamic states into peace.

A disinterested Congress decided to pay the ransom. In1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoli's ambassador to Great Britain to ask by what right his nation attacked American ships and enslaved American citizens, and why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.

The two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja had answered that Islam "was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran that all nations who would not acknowledge their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Muslim who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise."

Despite this stunning admission of premeditated violence on non-Muslim nations, as well as the objections of many notable American leaders, including George Washington, who warned that caving in was both wrong and would only further embolden the enemy, for the following fifteen years the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages.

The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to over 20 percent of the United States government annual revenues in 1800.

Jefferson was disgusted.  Shortly after his being sworn in as the third President of the United States in 1801, the Pasha of Tripoli sent him a note demanding the immediate payment of $225,000 plus $25,000 a year for every year forthcoming. That changed everything. Jefferson let the Pasha know, in no uncertain terms, what he could do with his demand.  The Pasha responded by cutting down the flagpole at the American consulate and declared war on the United States. Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers immediately followed suit.

Jefferson, until now, had been against America raising a naval force for anything beyond coastal defense, but, having watched his nation be cowed by Islamic thuggery for long enough, decided that it was finally time to meet force with force.      

He dispatched a squadron of frigates to the Mediterranean and taught the Muslim nations of the Barbary Coast a lesson he hoped they would never forget.  Congress authorized Jefferson to empower U.S. ships to seize all vessels and goods of the Pasha of Tripoli and to "cause to be done all other acts of precaution or hostility as the state of war would justify".

When Algiers and Tunis, who were both accustomed to American cowardice and acquiescence, saw the newly independent United States had both the will and the right to strike back, they quickly abandoned their allegiance to Tripoli.

The war with Tripoli lasted for four more years, and raged up again in 1815.  The bravery of the U.S. Marine Corps in these wars led to the line "to the shores of Tripoli" in the Marine Hymn, and they would forever be known as "leathernecks" for the leather collars of their uniforms, designed to prevent their heads from being cut off by the Muslim scimitars when boarding enemy ships. Islam, and what its Barbary followers justified doing in the name of their prophet and their god, disturbed Jefferson quite deeply.

America had a tradition of religious tolerance. In fact, Jefferson himself had co-authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, but fundamentalist Islam was like no other religion the world had ever seen.  A religion based on supremacy, whose holy book not only condoned but mandated violence against unbelievers, was unacceptable to him. His greatest fear was that someday this brand of Islam would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States.

Sadly, it appears that today America's leaders would rather be politically correct than victorious! If you have any doubts about the above information, Google: "Thomas Jefferson vs. the Muslim”.

Jerry Thibodeau


Harold Brown - Large Scale Corruption

Jan. 28, 2016
Howdy;  Nothing in this World operates the way you think it does, Nothing    J. Maxwell
I had planned on sending out my rant regarding the killing of an innocent by the FBI At Burns Oregon.   LaVoy Finicum was shot in the face, than riddle his body with gunfire.  LaVoy was unarmed, hands in the air when he was murdered.

Got side track with this news of Bloomberg’s  gun grabbing agenda.   This video will wake you up to the corruption happening to take arms from (all of us-emphasis).
Visit the post for more.

Mention many times Sandy Hook is a hoax.   I have submitted only two links, there is much more.  Trying not to overload you with information at once.            Sandy Hook  Part  2                          More Sandy Hook

In Freedom

Harold Brown - NO To Mandatory Flu Vaccinations For Kids

Dec 17
Howdy;   Finally the people, most cases get a break.   Once and awhile a good judge comes along.  The doctrine of this decision should establish Case Law.   Very powerful decision.   No longer will Children Protective Services break up families due to parents refusal to vaccinate their children.   To me this decision can be used to penetrate the veil of immunity and successfully sue public officials and public employees.

Be sure to visit Catherine J. Frompovich Site, the link is in the article  

Nothing in this World Operates the Way you Think it Does-Nothing.  J. Maxwell

In Freedom

Eric T. Rottenecker - Spending Spree!

If you were to go down to any of the Drug Task Force hearings you would see a bunch of state unionized employees who have a special vested interest, testifying, looking to enlarge their departments. The vocal minority, the politician’s voter base. It will be very interesting five years from now when NH is 80% grey and can no longer support all of this big government and state retirees when this year alone there was a mad scramble to find $10.5million for the state employees retirement fund shortfall. Just one more raid on a dedicated fund.

The war on drugs is costing the US $50billion annually in enforcement, judicial and incarceration all of which are unionized. You will not see our politicians threaten to reduce any of our state or federal enforcement agencies. That is why we are not hearing any more on NH becoming a Right-to-work state, the state employee unions wouldn't allow it, the politician who leads that charge would be voted out as fast as Governor Benson.

In 1914 President Wilson signed into law the Harrison act to suppress minority's use of drugs, in 1937 came FDR with the Reefer madness program and in 1971 tricky Dick Nixon jumped into the war on drugs to suppress white anti-war college students, just as all of the previous administrations used it to build up vested departments from coast to coast and suppress minority's. You never hear of any white collar American busted for smoking a joint. But smoke it they do.

 Tobacco subsidies in the US totaled $1.5 billion from 1995-2012. Tobacco kills 6 million people worldwide, our Governors see fit to increase the tax on tobacco any chance they can. Alcohol kills 3.3 million annually, but it is socially acceptable. Tens of thousands of people are killed on our roads by drunk drivers. We are building a new liquor store in New Hampton. Why aren't we fighting the war on socially acceptable drugs that kill? It would mean the loss of revenue from taxation, the loss of social workers, unionized law enforcement don't see it as an Epidemic  and after all, how would our law makers celebrate their spending spree victory without their favorite glass of wine. Wine by the way is a gateway drug. So is beer, but we have to keep marijuana illegal because it is a gateway drug? I ‘Never’ heard of a marijuana overdose. I ‘Never’ heard of any one with withdrawal symptoms from marijuana. We have a shit load of hypocrites in government. 

The US spends $50 billion annually and along comes the NH Senator Forrester with her big $70+ million spending spree and Senator Shaheen with her $600 million, to increase law enforcement to combat opiate misuse, the real goal, to enlarge their voter base. Just more special interest groups with their lobbyists and unions telling our politicians how and what they should be spending taxpayer moneys on. The politicians, who answer to no one when it comes to spending taxpayer moneys, are eager to comply, just so they can stay in office. The outcome will remain the same. Looks like we are going to fight the loosing war on drugs for another 100 years. This is the form of democracy we are pushing around the world and getting rammed down our throats. Welcome to the Unionized States of America. 

Eric T. Rottenecker

Harold Brown - The Truth About Cancer

Howdy;   I’m sending this/link to every link I have hopefully to save a life.   Information is knowledge.  Share the videos with your family and friends.   I won’t be as nice as some of the commentators in the video(s).   Cancer is a Racket.   I just lost my sister to cancer, she was diagnosis for the last 25 plus years.  Seems like every treatment was an experiment.   At the end she was talked into conventional treatment.  I was against chemo and radiation.   Needless to say the end was not pleasant.

The program is a nine series commentary.   I originally received the program from, if you don’t subscribe to this site, you should.   Must sign in, your name, email address and click onto the access button.   Newer links will be sent automatic.          Come to your own conclusions after the series.   

In Freedom

Jon C –Dr. Carson You’re Too Late Regarding Muslim Presidents

A good friend and former NH resident now living in Tennessee sent me the following emails. I know the left wing MSM will go ballistic over anyone even broaching the idea that President Obama may be a Muslim!

So right from the source himself below is a video compilation of speeches President Obama made prior to his election in 2008. The video is a total of over 9 minutes but it takes no more than a minute or two to get the root of this video


The second email concerned who is running the government. Seems President Obama has stuck to an agenda of “inclusion” regarding Muslims. Look how many people in high positions are Muslims. One wonders from here how many other Muslims are part of the rank and file members on the government payroll.

Never has there been, in our government,  so many individuals who belong to a religion that you either join or you will be killed? 


When you read this you will understand why Obama refuses to say the words "radical Islam." 
I didn't originate this, but it checked out. 
Did you know that we now have a Muslim government? 
John Brennan, current head of the CIA converted to Islam while stationed in Saudi Arabia . 
Obama's top advisor, Valerie Jarrett, is a Muslim who was born in Iran where her parents still live. 
Hillary Clinton's top advisor, Huma Abedin is a Muslim, whose mother and brother are involved in the now outlawed Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt . 
Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for  Homeland Security, Arif Aikhan, is a Muslim. 
Homeland Security Advisor, Mohammed Elibiary, is a Muslim. 
Obama advisor and founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, Salam al-Marayati, is a Muslim. 
Obama's Sharia Czar, Imam Mohamed Magid, of the Islamic Society of North America is a Muslim. 
Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships, Eboo Patel, is a Muslim. 
It's questionable if Obama ever officially took the oath of office when he was sworn in. He didn't repeat the oath properly to defend our nation and our Constitution. Later the Democrats claimed he was given the oath again in private? 
CIA director John Brennan took his oath on a copy of the Constitution, not a Bible. 
Congressman, Keith Ellison took his oath on a copy of the Qur'an. 
Congresswoman Michele Bachman was vilified and almost tarred and feathered by Democrats when she voiced her concern about Muslims taking over our government. 
Considering all these appointments, it would explain why Obama and his minions are systematically destroying our nation, supporting radical Muslim groups worldwide, opening our southern border, and turning a blind eye to the genocide being perpetrated on Christians all over Africa and the Middle East. 
The more damage Obama does, the more arrogant he becomes! 
Our nation and our government has been infiltrated by people who want to destroy us. It can only get worse! 


Harold Brown - In the Dark: Prohibiting States From Labeling of GMO Foods?

In The Dark

On July 23, 2015 the U.S House of Representatives voted and passed H.R. 1599, H.R 1599 has to do with prohibiting states labeling of GMO foods.  Called the Safe Act.  How can it be safe not knowing what food and chemicals you are ingesting?   Tainted food paid for with your had earned money.  H.R. 1599 is also known as the DARK Act, (Deny Americans Right to Know). The emphasis of this post is Labeling and your right to know.   Congressman Guinta voted Yea on H.R. 1599 denying your right to know.   Also in H.R. 1599 the authority to call GMO’s natural as in ingredients.   Labeling of food is a home rule issue.  Falls under the preview of the 9th. And 10th. Amendments.   H.R. 1599 is Unconstitutional along with Congressman Guinta’s vote.  Congressman Guinta vote is unacceptable under any argument.   Congresswoman Kuster did vote Nay.

Residents of District One have one of three choices, vote in a Democrat, Republicans can replace Frank Guinta or re-elect Congressman Guinta keep poor representation or no representation..

In Freedom

Harold - ‘NEW DAY FOR AMERICA’ By Kasich For President ad was the inspiration for this post

Hi folks;
Bringing you a video by Jordan Maxwell.   Dawn of a New Day, Timing is appropriate due to slogans Presidential Candidates are using.  The purpose is to enlighten people for awareness.   Some material some will find offensive.

The main theme will be the rising Sun. as a Communist Symbol.   New Day could be taken as leading to a path of communism.   If many of you never notice the Rising Sun is embedded in the NH State Flag rising over the horizon.  The symbol of the Fasces will be explained.   Not shown is the fact two Fasces are mounted on each side of the podium in the U.S. Senate Chambers.   I’ve never heard any official complain serving under Fascism symbols.   Some facts will past rapidly, stop, write them down and do a search.   .            

In Freedom

Dear NH Democratic Leadership

I was unaware that you wished the destruction of Planned Parenthood's influence over New Hampshire public policy. I had assumed you believed abortion was a good thing, due to your undying support for the organization. Now I realize that you were actually trying to show, by theatrical demonstration, that the only way to support such an organization so passionately would be that you actually have to not really give a shit what they did with unborn babies at any point, any stage, using any tool, and following any moral gauge.

Sincerely, I would like to thank you for all of your efforts in ending the dominance of Planned Parenthood on American politics. We really couldn't do it without you. 

The whole idea of sticking to the Planned Parenthood talking points without ever stooping to actually look into the allegations made against them is a stroke of genius. What it does, in essence, is remind the American people that it is not actually 1971, and that although they may do a great deal of moral analysis internally over the question of abortion and medical ethics, and they might feel horrified at the abuses uncovered in the recent video releases, you would actually have to be kind of a monster to just ignore it.

Further, it serves as proof to the American people that there never actually was any moral discussion over abortion in the Democratic Party, and in fact that the question of life or death always really took a back seat to the question of votes.

I love the stonewall tactics. The lack of genuine debate. The lack of concern. The “seemingly” heartless defense of the sellers of human body parts, arrived at by a thoughtless knee jerk defense of Planned Parenthood, at all costs.

Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!

Thank you, because while the American people debate the topic, weep openly, tear their hearts out and share videos showing atrocities worthy of the Third Reich in social media every day, the NH Democratic Party, by its blind attachment to the most ruthless medical practices since Mengele, actually shows us all the truth.


And, for that I am one happy pro-lifer.

See, gay marriage is legal...done. Even the most conservative among us have just moved on. Health care is done. It may not be perfect but it was a Democratic creation. So...not much chance for a moral end run. I say abortion, you can't say “gays”. I say abortion, you can't say “health care”. I say abortion, you can only show that blank psychotic stare that Democrats have developed over the decades. I say abortion and you have one answer and you wear it proudly, you say “Couldn't care less.”

And, organizations made up of heartless jerks who show zero concern for human babies tend not to last very long.

Thanks again, and congratulations on the brilliant strategy!!

Concerned Democrat


NB: withheld writers name at their request.

Ahead of The Curve "Heroin Legislation"

Most recent federal government data from 2011 shows on average one person dies of an overdose every two hours; totaling 4,102. Since 2011 this epidemic has grown far beyond those numbers. In 2014 New Hampshire suffered over 300 overdoses, Maine totaled 208, Vermont reported 65 and Massachusetts estimates their total dead to exceed 1,000. 

Any legislation addressing our epidemic should be approached with commonsense and the reality that this will be a substantial effort for all parties involved. I propose three pronged legislation aimed specifically at attacking the networks of trafficker, providing federal grants for opioid addiction treatment and federal prosecutorial aid in the form of grants provided to state and local judicial bodies.

Traffickers transport large quanities of these killer drugs all across our country. Under current law, they will serve terms that are disproportionate to the damage caused to our communities. I call for strengthening the penalties for those convicted and lowering the bar for what constitutes as a federal trafficking offense. A good starting point would be mandatory minimums for anyone trafficking opioids in quanities of 50 grams or more starting at 5 years and increasing by 2 years for every 10 grams. 

While the federal government is spending money wildly on a myriad of things. I believe we should allocate emergency funds to help with addiction treatment, specifically opioid dependence. This funding should contain a rider. The rider would stipulate that the funding will only be allocated by the states legislator to pay for addiction counseling both inpatient and out patient, focusing primarily on non-supplement therapies. Any state found in violation of this rider will need to refund all grant monies to the federal government within 30 days.

Grants for prosecutorial aid would infuse money into the judicial systems to setup and maintain drug courts for low level offenders. Relieving the burden placed on the courts and be more of a good behavior system than a money driven court. Monies granted to the judicial would have a stipulation that the offender be entered into a program without supervision costs as well as no drug testing fees. So that they may focus more on lasting recovery instead of fees and fines. All offenders must be sentenced to community enrichment programs where they will serve one day a week cleaning trash in parks and throughout the communities they live in for a term of 6 months starting when weather permits. These grants will also contain the same riders as the treatment programs.


Jamieson Gradert

Republican Candidate for NH CD1

We Need Tax Reform, NOW!

The New Hampshire primary is an important milestone on the path to the Presidential nomination. Candidates who come here get to know New Hampshire. This primary presents candidates with the perfect platform for discussing issues that are most important to voters. Many candidates are discussing tax reform. While their voices are important in this discussion, we need more immediate action on tax reform from Congress.

This primary gives us the stage to make sure not just our presidential candidates are listening, but our public servants at-large.  Our current tax system has a number of problems. It taxes unevenly across business sectors. Tax increases on energy have a great effect on business owners in that sector, who already shoulder significantly higher tax rates than business owners in other industries. Those costs trickle down to the everyday Americans who have energy stocks in their retirement packages. This isn’t a “rich man’s tax increase”, it’s an attack on the well-being of everyday Americans and incredibly harmful to the energy sector.

If we as a nation are to do the hard work of tax reform, we must do it in the right way. We, the people of New Hampshire, should lead the way. Let’s do tax reform right.

NH corruption fighter Andy Martin opposes "Balsams Bailout" bill

May 6, 2015 

Dear State Legislator: 

I am writing you a letter/email with two purposes in mind.

First, I am writing to urge you to vote against and work against the so-called “Balsams Bailout” bill. It is bad legislation and it will come back to haunt state and local taxpayers.


Second, if you have been a regular legislative reader of my emails for years, you may enjoy this letter; you will of course remain on our list. If you are a new legislator, welcome. Please stay with us. If you previously opted out of our emails you may want to consider rejoining. Let me give some of my background before I get to the Balsams Bailout issue. 

Why read our independent Republican emails? There are several reasons: 

1. The media and political leaders pay attention to what I have to say. On April 19th some conservative activists met in Nashua to plan for the 2016 presidential primary. Channel 9 ignored the conservatives. Not one word of the conservative meeting appeared on the station. Then, I criticized WMUR for ignoring conservatives. The next day Channel 9 “discovered” the Sunday meeting and made a report. That’s impact.


2. I can be of help to you. Fifty (50) years ago in January, 1965 I went tothe Illinois General Assembly as an intern to learn bill drafting. That summer I went to Washington to study under the man who would become U. S. Senate parliamentarian. My political experience is deep. Over the years I have created initial drafts of proposed statutes that went on to generate intense analysis. I am here to help you with questions, analysis, whatever you might need help with. And unlike some people, I am not looking to get into your pocket. I only work for the good of the people of New Hampshire. My only agenda is public integrity and good governance. So if and when you need help, all you have to do is pick up the phone or email me.


3. I am independent. I fought for the people of the North Country all the way to the New Hampshire Supreme Court to save the original Balsams, the real Balsams hotel, not the real estate speculation you are now being asked to vote on. The court system is not there to serve our people. It is there to preserve the special interests of a handful influential players in the state.


4. Please do not expect to agree with me all the time. I am critical of the corruption and incompetence within the New Hampshire Republican Party’s leadership. My views are often provocative, novel, irritating, occasionally even raw. I am spearheading the opposition nationally to Jeb Bush’s presidential campaign. I am committed to seeing the Bush dynasty come to an abrupt end in the snows of New Hampshire next year. So don’t send me a “REMOVE” the first time you disagree with me. Expect to disagree with me. I am an independent voice for good government within the Republican Party, so you won’t always agree with me. But it is good to listen to dissenting points of view. And you can always send me a response with your point of view. I will read it, even if I disagree.


5. My mother’s family immigrated to New Hampshire from Greece 100 years ago, in 1915. I have not always lived in New Hampshire, but my family roots go back a long way. I always put the people, not politics, first.


I will work hard to keep a Republican New Hampshire House and Senate in 2016 and beyond. You can count on me. I will help you in any way possible.


Why vote against the “Balsams Bailout?”


The people of the North Country were robbed and cheated by the trustees of the Neil Tillotson Trust. Tillotson left The Balsams in trust for the people. When employees invited me in the summer of 2011 to visit, The Balsams was an amazing place. It was both historic and up-to-date modern. It provided about 300 jobs, a culinary training program and a loyal client list. All a new owner had to do was call back the employees, provision the pantry and freezer, and open for business. The experience was truly extraordinary.


The “Two Dannys” from Colebrook purchased The Balsams as a real estate speculation, not to reopen and restore The Balsams. They tore the Balsams apart. They vandalized the hotel and auctioned off pieces of New Hampshire history. The Balsams is gone. Truly, the “Two Dannys” are North Country thugs.


Now a new group of real estate promoters is promising big things. But the Balsams that was, is no more. No restoration is possible. So you have to judge the Balsams Bailout not as reopening a piece of New Hampshire history but rather as a de novo real estate speculation. If the Two Dannys had reopened the old Balsams, they could have provided immediate income to the North Country and gradually rebuilt the Balsams, while retaining the flavor that made the resort ‘historic.” Instead, four years later, the hotel has been destroyed. The Two Dannys never had any intention of serving the people, any more than the lying dirtbag Tillotson Trust trustees had any intention of honoring Neil Tillotson’s intentions when he established the Balsams trust.


So why would New Hampshire taxpayers pass a law to bail out a project that is nothing more than a very risky real estate speculation? The Two Dannys have almost “zero” investment in the property. The new speculators want to build with other peoples money, taxpayers’ money, not their own. In other words, none of the current bunch of promoters that is asking for a bailout has any serious cash of their own invested. They want the taxpayers to guarantee loans where they would not themselves put in the first dollar of equity.


If I came to you and asked you to invest in a property I was promoting, but which I declined to invest in myself, would you invest? Obviously not. The people of the North Country had a valuable resource, an incredible asset in the old Balsams. But that Balsams no longer exists and can never be “restored.” You are now being asked to be a “banker” for real estate speculators that won’t risk significant funds of their own in the project. How much equity have the Two Dannys got in the project? Close to nothing. The other “blue sky promoters?” Virtually nothing relative to the risk taxpayers are assuming. Until the promoters put in serious cash equity I see no reason for taxpayers to essentially put up the cash equity by guaranteeing loans that the promoters themselves are unwilling to fund with their own assets.


The Balsams Bailout? A bad bill. If you need more information, give me a call. If you really want to help the people of the North Country, as I have tried to do, give me a call. But, please, vote down this sickening example of New Hampshire corruption and perversion of Neil Tillotson’s will.


While still a law student I became a real estate investor. I have made a lot of money in real estate. I know real estate and I know risk. I have seen the ins and outs of real estate wheeling and dealing at the highest levels. Don’t be played for a sucker by out-of-state real estate promoters. The people of the North Country need help, but not this kind of help. I am telling you from the depth of my heart the Balsams Bailout bill stinks. Please VOTE NO.


Faithfully yours for the Granite State,


Andy Martin




P.S. Please forward a copy of this email to a Democrat. Maybe we can talk some sense to some of them.

Peter Macdonald - Town of Lee NH Evicts US Military Veterans

To the Editor

            What does it take to get the newspaper to report the news?  On separate occasions the Lee Selectmen evicted two different homeless US Military Veterans from Church property.  The Town of Lee’s reason “We are a community of Professors and UNH support staff so we do not deserve homeless in our neighborhoods”.  I paid last week to have it printed in the news as an advertisement.  I have heard on face book it went wild.  The truth is a powerful weapon but silence can destroy democracy.  What is wrong with the news media ethics when it comes to our US Military Veterans?  Homeless should not be a reason to forget us. 

Peter Macdonald Sgt USMC Semper Fi


Hoax, or is it the Truth?

Hoax, or is it the Truth?

In posting these links I feel I will have a major issue with Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (TCD

The following: I copied and saved, source unknown.   ‘Now, there is a chronological sequence of events that placed us where we are today. We can almost assure you that you will reject, or want to reject, parts of what you are about to see and hear. There is a theory known as the Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (TCD) that holds that the mind involuntarily rejects information not in line with previous thoughts and/or actions. Brace yourself, the following message may be entirely different from anything you heretofore believed to be true. If you are unaware, you are unaware of being unaware‘!

I state my disclaimer as the same as Joyce Riley in her audio.

The links relate to the Hoax of Sandy Hook.  Nobody talks about the hoax, maybe one reason is
Cognitive Dissonance .or just plain ignorance.   Sandy Hook never happen???   You watch the video, do your own creative thinking and do research if possible.  In the news business (even alternative news) everyone distorts the  truth to promote their own agenda.   You decide was Sandy Hook a hoax, a staged event.   Also if you have the ability copy these videos, do so, they are constantly being remove from the internet.  Removal is similar to burning books.   Apparently there are people who don’t want all the facts of  Sandy Hook exposed.    The videos are very educational, that’s the purpose of this presentation to educate the viewer.  

The FBI crime report for 2012 states nobody was murdered in Newton Ct.   You may run into folks claiming the perpetuators of the Sandy Hook Hoax movement have evil, self serving intentions.  These folks will not stick to the facts only personally attacks to discredit the exposure of the great fraud.   Sandy Hook’s purpose is about gun (arms) control and mental health.

Gun (arms) laws (possession) are unlawful, always have been and always will be in the future as long as we have a Republic form of government.   If the Judiciary did their job according  their Oath there would no debate about Second Amendment or Article 2a,   Last time I read Our Constitution(s) I didn’t read one word about firearm(s) licensure.  If  it isn’t there you can’t do it.  

The evidence always tells the truth-Dr. Judy Woods   

Over five and half hours of viewing time, educate yourself.  All links worked upon posting

In Freedom
Harold                    Be Sure  to Read the Comments

Donate to help homeless combat veterans

                                                Veteran Resort-Chapel

                                                101 Stepping Stone Rd

                                                Lee NH 03824


To The Editor

            It is sad when a 100% disabled US Military Veteran asks the State of NH for help and no one comes.  On some grounds I am a combat Veteran because I did do eight convoys across Laos, Cambodia into the DMZ to bring surplus supplies to friendly posts as American advisor.  I was a part of the Marine Corp Air Wing and only did the convoys when I got injured during a Vietnam Offensive and I was put on light duty riding as the only American on 27 truck missions.  I did do thirty-one months over there in and out of Vietnam, some times repair missions, sometimes convoys. 

            It is sad when the Veteran’s Page of the Union Leader refuses to acknowledge that a Veteran is asking for help.  It would be one thing if it was help for ones self but it is for help-giving out for homeless Combat Veterans.  The Veteran Resort-Chapel is a great way to challenge the citizens of the State of NH to put a tiny house in their back yard with a compost toilet to allow a homeless combat US Military Veteran to live in it until they can come home mentally as well as physically. This is a challenge that I put forward on the UNH community challenge.  My wife and I have used up our life savings and mortgaged our home because this mission to help homeless combat veterans is so important. I now travel the state with a tiny home that I built on a trailer to ask for people to donate.  The newspapers refuse to help.  WMUR (Amy Coveno) did a great new broad cast when we first started but not one word since. 

            We are Combat Veterans living on the streets of this state; are not your enemy.  We are the children that went off to war and came back to a nation that does not want us and we do not belong.  I am now asking for your help with donations to build the cabins in the woods sanctuary at 101 Stepping Stone Rd Lee NH.  There is a web site where you can learn and see just how these missions will work.  Please go to the web site and learn.  A donation to the Veteran Resort-Chapel account at any People’s United Bank will 100% go to help a homeless US Military Veteran and nothing else.  Take up the UNH challenge or donate to help build the VRC mission of helping homeless combat US Military Veterans.

Thank You Peter Macdonald

                     465 Packers falls Rd

                      Lee NH 03824            

It is Time to Work Toward a Debt Free Future

It is only fair and right to pay the debt we have incurred so our children and grandchildren are not stuck with our bills. When politicians and bureaucrats speak about “raising the debt ceiling,” they are telling us they want to borrow more money. Money they won’t ever pay back. That is wrong. Continually increasing the debt of the United States puts an undue and unfair burden on future generations of Americans. The only reasonable response is to just say no. It is unfair and unjust to burden our children with a national debt we have run up paying for an unsustainable life style.

The current U.S. national debt is about $18 trillion. That means every single American citizen’s share of the national debt is about $60,000. This year the federal government will borrow 40 cents of every dollar it spends. The yearly budget deficit continues to exceed $1 trillion. The country’s political “leadership” has not meaningfully reduced spending, regardless of which political party has been in control. 

The response to this issue coming from our political “leadership” has been to simply ignore it. They have taken more of your money through taxation but not enough to eliminate the deficit. They have raised the debt ceiling so they don’t have to hold themselves accountable to spending within our means. They are printing more money instead of cutting back on the runaway spending and reducing the size of the government. The current path is unsustainable. We must reverse the “in place” policies and replace them with policies that help us repair the damage. We must work to create a debt free future so that our children and grandchildren will be able see greater opportunities ahead.

The solution is getting federal spending under control.  One simple solution to move toward a debt free future is the Penny Plan. Cutting federal spending by 1 percent every year for the next ten years will cut more than $4.5 trillion from the debt. This means cutting just 1 penny out of every dollar the government spends each year. Requiring the government to spend one percent less next year than it does this year is a good way to get control of federal spending and finally begin reducing the debt.  There are other plans available. The point is the do nothing alternative is no longer reasonable. We need some meaningful changes.

The federal government is incapable of meaningful change. It is unresponsive to our needs and desires. To take back our rights as citizens, states and Americans we do have a path forward. To do that; we must pass an application for an article V Convention of States in the NH House and NH Senate this year. This would call for an amending convention. We should seek to address the abuses being perpetrated by the federal government which are: 1. Spending and Debt, 2. Regulatory Excess, 3. Congressional Attacks on State Sovereignty, 4. Federal Takeover of the Decision-Making Process.

If you support a debt free future you might be conservative. If you believe it is only fair and right to pay the debt we have incurred so our children and grandchildren are not stuck with our bills you might be conservative. If you believe the actions of the present affect the possibilities for the future you might be a conservative. Please join me by reaching out to your state representative and senator. Ask them to support the application for a Convention of States. Let's return to what made America great.

Sincerely, Marc Abear    Meredith