Online Poker Players Scramble to Regain Basic Rights
Friday, August 3, 2007 at 09:11PM It may be hard for some to believe, but even a guy like me needs to escape from politics from time to time. And there is typically only one place in this world where I can achieve a complete escape -- the poker table.
Poker players, bless their hearts, are some of the most apolitical human beings on the planet. I’m sure I’m not the only exception to this rule, but I can tell you this -- I have logged a lot of hours in public cardrooms around the country, and I’ve almost never heard a comment that had anything to do with politics.
Unfortunately, there’s an obvious and huge downside to being apolitical. I’m talking about the fundamental lesson that you can’t always count on somebody else to protect your basic rights when busybody politicians decide to attack them. I pretty much quit playing online poker last year, and it wasn’t by choice. It was because the U.S. government forced private businesses to stop providing millions of Americans with a recreational service enjoyed freely around the world.
The online poker community was shocked last year when Congress passed the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act. A lot of us heard it was coming, but then one day it just happened. Immediately, online poker sites around the world began refusing to do business with U.S. customers. Some of the most prominent sites buckled under the pressure and shut down. For those of us who play, the world changed in an altogether bad way, and yes, we have every right to be angry about it.
Like so many pieces of legislation we see, the bill wasn’t even voted on by itself. It was simply attached to a “must pass” port security bill that had nothing whatsoever to do with online gambling. The sponsor, Bill Frist (R-TN), showed that he is pretty shrewd when it comes to legislative processes, but he ought to know it is never good politics to wage a war on poker, not in these United States.
There are always a handful of busybody moralists lurking around any state house, and there are plenty in D.C. as well, but they are nothing, absolutely nothing in comparison to the millions of online poker players whose liberty has been stripped by this legislation.
So Joe or Jane Pokerplayer, if you’ve never done anything political in your entire life, now would be a great time to begin exercising your rights as a U.S. citizen and frequent payer of taxes. Call your Congressperson's office (Paul Hodes 202-225-5206, Carol Shea-Porter 202-225-5456, neither of whom were in Congress last year to vote against poker) and politely tell the person who answers that America’s national pastime ought to be legal on the internet. Specifically, say you would like Congress to pass Robert Wexler’s Skill Game Protection Act and other pieces of legislation that would repair the damage and (can’t believe I’m saying these next words) legalize poker.
Here’s what Wexler (D-FL) had to say about the Frist bill:
In essence, it's the newest form of prohibition. The prohibition is consenting adults cannot play poker over the Internet. Ironically, the Congress, the last Congress, said you can gamble on horses over the Internet, you can play State lotteries over the Internet but you can't play games of skill over the Internet. I thought as really a matter of personal freedom more than anything else, Congress should not be telling consenting adults in America what games they can play on the Internet.
Like many Americans, the longer I think about this one, the madder I’m going to get. People in other countries are allowed to play poker online, so why the hell aren’t we?!?!
For more information, visit the Poker Players Alliance.
Matt Simon |
8 Comments | 
Reader Comments (8)
Playing poker is permitted. Gambling money while playing poker is not. Buying & selling shares on the stock market is permitted. Gambling money on the the stock market is as well. Go figure.
I'll wager 5 will get you 10 at Leavenworth -or is it, I can either shop at the 5 and 10 or at Woolworths?
Either way, if people want to gamble at a poker table what does it matter? Its a gamble just going accross the bridges in America.
Heh, that's like saying you can eat ice cream, but you're not allowed to swallow.
Thanks for the comment.
Matt
Of course you're right, and I still play occasionally on the sites that are still open. But they've made it such a pain in the ass to transfer money that it almost isn't worth it sometimes. The poker marketplace has been badly tainted by these regulations, and it affects any player's bottom line when competition between competing sites is limited or discouraged. Where have all the good bonuses gone?
Matt
Matt
Thanks, that's an excellent comment.
I was doing most of my damage at William Hill and other European sites in the Cryptologic network, so I was totally miffed when they had to stop serving U.S. customers. Paradise Poker, Party Poker... they turned my world upside down.
Should have been clear when I was writing this, but the topic had me all lathered up -- I don't like the Barney Frank bill. I did specifically mention Wexler's Skill Game Protection bill, which should be passed immediately.
Also, make no mistake -- there are plenty of politicians in this world who would like to shut down online poker entirely. This blog entry was my attempt to, in a small way, inspire a few poker players to activism.
Matt